Sunday, March 15, 2009
Friday, March 6, 2009
The Demon Zionists
[copy]
History is written by the victors - or is it? The ancient history of the Jewish people seems to me to have a very important twist. As I have written, Jewish history tells us that when King David conquered Jebus and made it his capital Jerusalem, he conciliated with a cult from Mount Zion - and the question is, did he rule them or did they rule him? The latter seems more plausible to me if we are to consider the behaviour of the most powerful Jews in history - the Zionists. How many Australians understand what being a Zionist actually means - I had no idea until I researched their history provoked by the Nazi methods of new Israel in their demand for someone else's land - supposedly to regain their ancient glory? Or supremacy as their God commanded them? In my simple terms, I would say that the Zionists' actions are the counterpart of history's worst exponents of the policy of absolute brutality to achieve a certain goal and claim that "the end justifies the means". Fair dinkum. To follow this policy, history seems to record that the aggressor first tests the weakness of the first opposition before they exercise their intentions. That certainly looks like the case in Palestine. After my Naval service I gained employment by an Oil Company who sent me to Bahrein to learn a certain type of fractionation. I found the people very friendly and if there was to be any criticism, it would be that the education of the most ordinary citizens left a lot to be desired. They were peaceful in the extreme and happy with their society and especially with their religious beliefs. The latter seemed to be "live and let live". They were not terrorists - they were just cursed with land and resources that others demanded. We should not underestimate the ultimate disasters that the Zionist invasion of Arab territory must eventually cause. Well might we say that life began in Mesopotamia!
NE OUBLIE.
Posted by Ernest William at 9:44 PM
6 comments:
IDHolm said...
G'day Ern,
.. not too shabby. Looks like someone offers you 2.54cm, you take the whole 1.609km. Well done, and now a 2nd welcome - to blog ownership.
March 7, 2009 4:51 AM
IDHolm said...
G'day again.
.. since you mention "King David," I'm supposing you know about a pivotal event leading up to the arguably illegal 'establishment' of 'modern' Israel, namely the The King David Hotel bombing, which was carried out on 22 July 1946 and *murdered* 91 people and left 46 more injured. Why is this bloody criminal act so remarkable, why mention it now? Well, apart from the fact that the KD-bombing was one of, if not the actual first example of modern-day terrorism, in the background to a TV report on the recent Clinton-Net'nYahoo meeting was the motive "KD." Looked like pretty disgusting hubris to me.
March 7, 2009 5:29 AM
orana gelar said...
Welcome to the blogosphere, Ern G.
March 7, 2009 6:31 PM
Ernest William said...
G'day ID. Apparently I have made a faux pas? I have only the wish to occupy the 2.54 cms that I thought I was offered. I don't understand what is meant by "author" "blogger" or "blog ownership". I still don't understand what a blog is - it gave birth sometime while I was otherwise occupied - I think.Unfortunately I have more problems than I thought. Even my Wife is having trouble explaining the computer to me. I guess that I am just not computer literate because I have difficulty absorbing all of the ways of this forum - and there seems to be many. I have no doubt that "bloggers" understand and enjoy the extraordinary amount of available avenues? And I enjoy the ability to say what I think and would like to continue to do so. I am afraid that my Naval service and my years of shiftwork trained me with only the ability to think and reason. So with respect, I would like to continue just commenting and enjoining in debate if that is okay?
Cheers Ern G.
March 7, 2009 8:13 PM
Ernest William said...
G'day again ID. Yes I did know about the terrorist attack on the King David Hotel which was only part of the continuing "terrorist sabotage" that the Zionists used to intimidate the war-weary British and their mandate. As I understand it, when the Brits completed their mandate the Zionists immediately unilaterally declared that they were the State of Israel. I believe that only the Americans accepted them, and that doesn't surprise me. The reason that I indulged myself with some history of the Jews; Hebrews and Zionists et al was because I wondered where they got the idea that they were entitled to the Palestinian land. In my simple mind I thought they were claiming that, subsequent to the holocaust, the world owed them a living - preposterous. After research, I have satisfied myself that they have no such right and their abhorrent treatment by the Nazis has been an excuse for pity, even by the relatives of the victims. The victims have been immortalised far more than the 20 million Russians who perished. They are not the only people; class; religion or race in history that have been brutally treated and their actions in the Middle East only demonstrates that they are quite capable of the same crimes. I notice ID that many scholars and Churchmen are now putting their credibility on the line to challenge the holocaust, not that it didn't happen, but that there were more than the Jews who suffered in the same way and in the same time and for the same reason. I believe that. The irony is that the Zionist cult and its message from their God, demands that they completely wipe out certain races - even their animals. I find their attitude an insult to the modern world and their treatment of the Arabs a crime against humanity. I would like to have more to say on this subject in the future.
Cheers Ern G.
March 7, 2009 8:42 PM
Ernest William said...
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22108.htm
"As The Arabs See The Jews".
By His Majesty King Abdullah printed in the American Magazine November 1947. This is an amazing prediction of the future actions of the Zionists but was ignored by the powers that be. It is a lengthy article but well worth a read. I quote just the first paras of this brilliant man: "I am especially delighted to address an American audience, for the tragic problem of Palestine will never be solved without American understanding, American sympathy, American support. So many billions of words have been writtn about Palestine - perhaps more than on any other subject in history - that I hesitate to add to them. Yet I am compelled to do so, for I am reluctantly convinced that the world in general, and America in particular, knows almost nothing of the true case for the Arabs. We Arabs follow, perhaps far more than you think, the press of America. We are frankly disturbed to find that for every word printed on the Arab side, a thousand are printed on the Zionist side. So America is the "pinnacle of freedom"?
NE OUBLIE.
March 7, 2009 9:09 PM
[headline article as originally published by Ernest William ]
History is written by the victors - or is it? The ancient history of the Jewish people seems to me to have a very important twist. As I have written, Jewish history tells us that when King David conquered Jebus and made it his capital Jerusalem, he conciliated with a cult from Mount Zion - and the question is, did he rule them or did they rule him? The latter seems more plausible to me if we are to consider the behaviour of the most powerful Jews in history - the Zionists. How many Australians understand what being a Zionist actually means - I had no idea until I researched their history provoked by the Nazi methods of new Israel in their demand for someone else's land - supposedly to regain their ancient glory? Or supremacy as their God commanded them? In my simple terms, I would say that the Zionists' actions are the counterpart of history's worst exponents of the policy of absolute brutality to achieve a certain goal and claim that "the end justifies the means". Fair dinkum. To follow this policy, history seems to record that the aggressor first tests the weakness of the first opposition before they exercise their intentions. That certainly looks like the case in Palestine. After my Naval service I gained employment by an Oil Company who sent me to Bahrein to learn a certain type of fractionation. I found the people very friendly and if there was to be any criticism, it would be that the education of the most ordinary citizens left a lot to be desired. They were peaceful in the extreme and happy with their society and especially with their religious beliefs. The latter seemed to be "live and let live". They were not terrorists - they were just cursed with land and resources that others demanded. We should not underestimate the ultimate disasters that the Zionist invasion of Arab territory must eventually cause. Well might we say that life began in Mesopotamia!
NE OUBLIE.
Posted by Ernest William at 9:44 PM
6 comments:
IDHolm said...
G'day Ern,
.. not too shabby. Looks like someone offers you 2.54cm, you take the whole 1.609km. Well done, and now a 2nd welcome - to blog ownership.
March 7, 2009 4:51 AM
IDHolm said...
G'day again.
.. since you mention "King David," I'm supposing you know about a pivotal event leading up to the arguably illegal 'establishment' of 'modern' Israel, namely the The King David Hotel bombing, which was carried out on 22 July 1946 and *murdered* 91 people and left 46 more injured. Why is this bloody criminal act so remarkable, why mention it now? Well, apart from the fact that the KD-bombing was one of, if not the actual first example of modern-day terrorism, in the background to a TV report on the recent Clinton-Net'nYahoo meeting was the motive "KD." Looked like pretty disgusting hubris to me.
March 7, 2009 5:29 AM
orana gelar said...
Welcome to the blogosphere, Ern G.
March 7, 2009 6:31 PM
Ernest William said...
G'day ID. Apparently I have made a faux pas? I have only the wish to occupy the 2.54 cms that I thought I was offered. I don't understand what is meant by "author" "blogger" or "blog ownership". I still don't understand what a blog is - it gave birth sometime while I was otherwise occupied - I think.Unfortunately I have more problems than I thought. Even my Wife is having trouble explaining the computer to me. I guess that I am just not computer literate because I have difficulty absorbing all of the ways of this forum - and there seems to be many. I have no doubt that "bloggers" understand and enjoy the extraordinary amount of available avenues? And I enjoy the ability to say what I think and would like to continue to do so. I am afraid that my Naval service and my years of shiftwork trained me with only the ability to think and reason. So with respect, I would like to continue just commenting and enjoining in debate if that is okay?
Cheers Ern G.
March 7, 2009 8:13 PM
Ernest William said...
G'day again ID. Yes I did know about the terrorist attack on the King David Hotel which was only part of the continuing "terrorist sabotage" that the Zionists used to intimidate the war-weary British and their mandate. As I understand it, when the Brits completed their mandate the Zionists immediately unilaterally declared that they were the State of Israel. I believe that only the Americans accepted them, and that doesn't surprise me. The reason that I indulged myself with some history of the Jews; Hebrews and Zionists et al was because I wondered where they got the idea that they were entitled to the Palestinian land. In my simple mind I thought they were claiming that, subsequent to the holocaust, the world owed them a living - preposterous. After research, I have satisfied myself that they have no such right and their abhorrent treatment by the Nazis has been an excuse for pity, even by the relatives of the victims. The victims have been immortalised far more than the 20 million Russians who perished. They are not the only people; class; religion or race in history that have been brutally treated and their actions in the Middle East only demonstrates that they are quite capable of the same crimes. I notice ID that many scholars and Churchmen are now putting their credibility on the line to challenge the holocaust, not that it didn't happen, but that there were more than the Jews who suffered in the same way and in the same time and for the same reason. I believe that. The irony is that the Zionist cult and its message from their God, demands that they completely wipe out certain races - even their animals. I find their attitude an insult to the modern world and their treatment of the Arabs a crime against humanity. I would like to have more to say on this subject in the future.
Cheers Ern G.
March 7, 2009 8:42 PM
Ernest William said...
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22108.htm
"As The Arabs See The Jews".
By His Majesty King Abdullah printed in the American Magazine November 1947. This is an amazing prediction of the future actions of the Zionists but was ignored by the powers that be. It is a lengthy article but well worth a read. I quote just the first paras of this brilliant man: "I am especially delighted to address an American audience, for the tragic problem of Palestine will never be solved without American understanding, American sympathy, American support. So many billions of words have been writtn about Palestine - perhaps more than on any other subject in history - that I hesitate to add to them. Yet I am compelled to do so, for I am reluctantly convinced that the world in general, and America in particular, knows almost nothing of the true case for the Arabs. We Arabs follow, perhaps far more than you think, the press of America. We are frankly disturbed to find that for every word printed on the Arab side, a thousand are printed on the Zionist side. So America is the "pinnacle of freedom"?
NE OUBLIE.
March 7, 2009 9:09 PM
[headline article as originally published by Ernest William ]
Saturday, February 28, 2009
well, look what the cat dragged in!
DNP:Fiona:Racist and abusive Keep it up
Submitted by Ernest William ... on February 28, 2009 - 6:44pm.
Eliot Ramsey: "In every Muslim country surveyed, overwhelming or near unanimous majorities expressed negative views toward Jews. The figure reached 99 percent in Jordan, 98 percent in Egypt and 94 percent in Pakistan. Twenty-eight percent of Jordanians and 22 percent of Egyptians volunteered that "Jews" were to blame for bad relations between Muslims and the West, although Jews were not mentioned in the question."
The survey, according to you, was done on the population of those countries. What makes you think that they are all Muslims?
And in any case - how surprising. Why would the Jews be unpopular in the Middle East when they have considered themselves as different since the beginning of their religion - or is that a race?For some unknown reason to me, new Israel classifies itself as "western" and is so considered by the Arab nations of the middle east.Bearing in mind that the history of the nomadic tribes of the Arabian Desert who evolved into the Jews of today, I find that fascinating.The east is east and the west is west and never the twain shall meet.Just one more point Eliot, if I was Jewish I would never want you to defend me.NE OUBLIE.
DNP is their code for 'Do no publish.' That censoring from Reynolds comes on top of this sort of s**t editorialising from Tonkin:
Fair dinkum Alan. in Gaza Media Statement
by Ernest William ... on February 26, 2009 - 9:52pm
...
Richard: Ernest, your work that hasn't been published has been considered by editors to be racist, abusive, or containing-despite requests- unsourced extracts. Implications that anything more sinister is afoot do little for your perceived credibility.
Ethics? What ethics? Credibility? Whose credibility?
Submitted by Ernest William ... on February 28, 2009 - 6:44pm.
Eliot Ramsey: "In every Muslim country surveyed, overwhelming or near unanimous majorities expressed negative views toward Jews. The figure reached 99 percent in Jordan, 98 percent in Egypt and 94 percent in Pakistan. Twenty-eight percent of Jordanians and 22 percent of Egyptians volunteered that "Jews" were to blame for bad relations between Muslims and the West, although Jews were not mentioned in the question."
The survey, according to you, was done on the population of those countries. What makes you think that they are all Muslims?
And in any case - how surprising. Why would the Jews be unpopular in the Middle East when they have considered themselves as different since the beginning of their religion - or is that a race?For some unknown reason to me, new Israel classifies itself as "western" and is so considered by the Arab nations of the middle east.Bearing in mind that the history of the nomadic tribes of the Arabian Desert who evolved into the Jews of today, I find that fascinating.The east is east and the west is west and never the twain shall meet.Just one more point Eliot, if I was Jewish I would never want you to defend me.NE OUBLIE.
DNP is their code for 'Do no publish.' That censoring from Reynolds comes on top of this sort of s**t editorialising from Tonkin:
Fair dinkum Alan. in Gaza Media Statement
by Ernest William ... on February 26, 2009 - 9:52pm
...
Richard: Ernest, your work that hasn't been published has been considered by editors to be racist, abusive, or containing-despite requests- unsourced extracts. Implications that anything more sinister is afoot do little for your perceived credibility.
Ethics? What ethics? Credibility? Whose credibility?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)